Property Taxes in Travis
County
What is the cost of
local governments to the average Austin
household?
The Real Estate Council of Austin, Inc. (RECA) conducts an "Austin Combined Cost of Governments Index" study each year. RECA created the index as a tool to track local tax trends and compare them to typical household income growth. The index looks at the taxing rates of the Austin Community College (ACC), Austin Independent School District (Austin ISD), Capital Metro, the City of Austin, Travis County, and Central Health (formerly called the Travis County Hospital District.)
The results for the year 2010 show income for a typical family of four inched up by 0.7 percent to $73,800 in 2010, compared to a whopping 6.9 percent increase in the annual tax burden per household, now at $6,500, up from $6,082 in 2009. The overall tax burden for a family of four is 8.8 percent of their total income.
During the past 21 years, median income for typical Austin area families has doubled. from $36,325 to $73,800, while the combined cost of governments has tripled, from $2,130 to $6,500.
Since 1989, median income for a typical family of four increased 103.2 percent while the accumulated costs of schools, roads, emergency services, jails, and other services increased 205.2 percent. It is a 21-year trend that shows intermittent signs of slowing, but then picks up again.
How is the Amount of Property Tax I
Pay Calculated and What Can I Do About It?
Formula
: VALUE X RATE = TAX
Taxable value
of your property X the tax
rate for each jurisdiction =
the property tax you must pay on the
real estate property you own
-
While many times
citizens pay close attention to property values, the
other side of the equation--the tax rate--is equally
as important.
Property values
are only one piece of the property tax puzzle. Each year,
local taxing authorities, such as the Board of Trustees
of the AISD or the Austin City Council, set property tax
rates for all real estate within their taxing
jurisdictions.
-
Most Travis County
residents pay property taxes to five authorities: ACC, Austin ISD, the
City of Austin, Travis County, and Central Health.
These tax rates
are set after each authority examines the needs of
operating budgets and debt payment in relation to the
total taxable value of properties located in the taxing
units jurisdiction.
During the
budgetary process, taxing authorities conduct public
hearings between August and September, which include
discussions regarding setting the upcoming fiscal
property tax rate.
If you are
interested in how much you pay in property taxes, you
should participate in the budget process to assure
that the tax rate for each taxing jurisdiction is
appropriately set.
Tax Rates (per $100 of
valuation)
|
Taxing
Authority |
ACC |
Austin ISD |
City of Austin |
Travis County |
Central Health |
|
2001 |
0.0500 |
1.5486 |
0.4597 |
0.4460 |
N/A |
|
2002 |
0.0500 |
1.5964 |
0.4597 |
0.4660 |
N/A |
|
2003 |
0.0771 |
1.6137 |
0.4928 |
0.4918 |
N/A |
|
2004 |
0.0900 |
1.6230 |
0.4430 |
0.4872 |
0.0779 |
2005 |
0.1000 |
1.6230 |
0.4430 |
0.4872 |
0.0779 |
2006 |
0.0965 |
1.4930 |
0.4126 |
0.4499 |
0.0734 |
2007 |
0.0958 |
1.1630 |
0.4034 |
0.4216 |
0.0693 |
2008 |
0.0954 |
1.2020* |
0.4028 |
0.4006 |
0.0679 |
2009 |
0.0946 |
1.2020 |
0.4209 |
0.4215 |
0.0674 |
2010 |
0.0951 |
1.227 |
0.4571 |
0.4658 |
0.0719 |
2011 |
0.0948 |
1.242 |
0.4811 |
0.4855 |
0.0789 |
*Required aTax Ratification Election on November 4, 2008
Below is contact information on the major taxing jurisdictions in Travis County and the schedules for the 2011 hearings. Please note that the Travis County Commissioners Court sets the property tax rate for Central Health (formerly Travis County Hospital District).
|
Taxing
Authority |
ACC |
Austin ISD |
City
of Austin |
Travis
County |
Central Health |
|
Budget/Tax Rate Hearings
Scheduled |
Public Hearing:
June 20 at 6:00 p.m. |
Public Hearing:
August 18 at 7:00 p.m. |
Public Hearings:
July 27 and August 17, and 24 at tba |
Public
Hearing:
Sept. 20 and 23 at time tba |
Public Hearing:
August 25 at 5:30 p.m. and Sept. 1 at 6:30 p.m. |
|
Contact
Number |
223-7613
Pat Stubbs |
414-2263
Steve West |
974-2610
Greg Canally |
854-9106
Rodney Rhodes |
978-8151
Carolyn
Konecny |
|
Address |
Highland
Business Center Rm #201
5930 Middle Fiskville Rd. |
1111 W.
6th Street |
City Council
Hall, Council Chambers, 301 W. 2nd Street |
Commissioners
Court,
314 W. 11th
|
Commissioners
Court,
314 W. 11th
|
|
Consider for
Approval |
July 5 at
6:00 p.m.
|
August 22 at 7:00 p.m. |
Sept. 12, 13, and 14 at 10:00 a.m. |
Sept. 27 at time tba |
Sept. 8 at 5:30 p.m. |
How is Property
Value Determined and What Can I Do About It?
The Travis Central Appraisal District (TCAD) determines the market value of your property using
the following process:
|
January - May 2011: The Travis County Appraiser determines property values as of January 1st based on
recent market data and cost or property income data
from the previous year. TCAD sends notice of appraised value to property owners by May 31st. |
|
June - July 2011: The
appraisal roll is finalized by TCAD, and
those rolls are turned over to each taxing
authority. (This must occur before the
jurisdictions begin their budget hearings.) |
|
August - Sept 2011: Each
taxing authority begins working on the next
fiscal budget, which includes setting the tax
rates. |
|
October - November 2011:
Property tax bills are mailed to property owners or
mortgage companies. |
|
January 31, 2012: Last
date to submit tax payment before accruing
penalties, interest or legal action. |
What you can do
about it?
- If you disagree with the taxable
value of your property and wish to protest, you may do so
by filing a written protest.
- The appraisal district has protest
forms available, but you need not use an official form.
- A notice of protest is sufficient
if it identifies the owner, the property that is the
subject of the protest and indicates that you are
dissatisfied with a decision made by the appraisal
district.
- You must file your notice of
protest by May 31 or no later than 30 days after the
appraisal district delivers a notice of appraised value
to you, whichever date is later. If you do not file a
notice of protest before the statutory deadlines, you
lose your right to protest. You also lose the right to
file a lawsuit about the taxable value of your
property.
- If you are concerned about how
much you pay in property taxes, you should be sure
the value of your property is properly
assessed.
Click here for more information about the local property tax process; and click here for information about protesting your appraisal.
Who Decides
How Public Schools are Financed?
- The
state law that governed school finance, which required school
districts that are classified as "property wealthy," such
as Austin ISD, to send substantial funding to the State of
Texas to be used for the benefit of "property poor"
school districts, was referred to as the
"Robin Hood" plan.
- While the state's financial
commitment to fund public education had fallen to about
40 percent of the total cost, Austin schools, categorized
as "property wealthy," received virtually no state aid.
In fiscal year 2009, the State of Texas required Austin ISD to send $177 million to State coffers, up $60 million from a year earlier. "Recapture" accounts for about 13 percent of the Austin ISD annual budget.
- It became apparent to many
policymakers, including school district officials and to
the public, that this antiquated method of financing
public schools needed improving, with the State
shouldering more of the public school finance
burden.
A number of steps have been taken to address school financing.
- On September 15, 2004, District
Judge John Dietz declared the so-called "Robin Hood" plan
unconstitutional. Judge Dietz stated that the current
school financing system did not allow local districts to
maintain meaningful discretion over their budgets due to
both a capped property tax rate and funds transfers from
"property-rich" districts to "property-poor"
districts.
- On November 22, 2005, the Texas
Supreme Court determined that the amount of money spent
per student is constitutional, at this time, to provide
the constitutionally guaranteed "general diffusion of
knowledge." The Court also determined that most local
school districts must tax property at the state
maximum $1.50 per $100 valuation to provide the "general
diffusion of knowledge," which has created a de
facto and unconstitutional statewide property tax.
- Governor Rick Perry called a
special session to address the Court's ruling. The 3rd
Special Session of the 79th Texas Legislature, which
adjourned May 15, 2006, was dedicated almost exclusively
to reworking school finance in Texas, to include
developing a new business tax structure. Highlights from
the session included:
- A 33% reduction of school
district O&M rate by 2008;
- A $2,000 per teacher pay
raise;
- Expansion of the franchise tax
(1%) to most businesses;
- $1 per pack tax increase on
cigarettes; and
- Mandate the report of accurate
sales price for used cars to tax assessor for
calculating sales taxes
- The new business tax
structure took effect in 2008. The Texas Legislature, which convened in January 2007, considered technical changes to the new business tax, which also took effect in 2008.
- 80th Texas Legislature (2007): House Bill 3928 by Representative Jim Keffer (R-Eastland) and Senator Steve Ogden (R-Bryan) was designed to clean up the business tax that the Legislature passed in special session in 2006. The bill clarified that capital gains from the sale of real property are included in the income that is subject to the 90% test for a passive entity. In addition, the bill modified the calculation of tax for small businesses with total revenue between $300,000 and $900,000 by applying a sliding discount scale ranging from an 80 percent discount for taxable entities with total revenue less than $400,000 to a 20 percent discount for taxable entities with total revenue greater than $700,000 but less than $900,000. Under previous law, taxable entities with total revenue of less than $300,000 owe no tax. The bill also provided an optional alternative method for calculating tax for businesses with total revenue of $10 million or less. A qualified taxable entity would calculate tax by multiplying apportioned total revenue by 0.575 percent. A taxable entity electing this calculation would be eligible for the discounts for taxable entities with total revenue less than $900,000, but could not use tax credits or other adjustments. Partnerships are required to include gross rental income instead of net rental income in determining total revenue.
- 81st Texas Legislature (2009): House Bill 4765, by Representative Rene Oliveira (D-Brownsville) and Senator Dan Patrick (R-Houston), increased the small business tax exemption from businesses making less than $300,000 to those making less than $1 million for tax years 2009 and 2010, for returns filed in 2010 and 2011. The effect of this bill is to remove the franchise tax burden on approximately 40,000 businesses that paid franchise tax in 2008. The exemption will be dropped to $600,000 in 2011 for returns filed in 2012.
- On Monday, November 28, 2011, the Texas Supreme Court ruled on a claim by Allcat Claims Service LP, a Boerne insurance adjustment firm, arguing that the franchise tax levied against the partnership reduced the income of its partners, making it an income tax. The Court ruled that the business tax that took effect in 2008, the franchise (or margins) tax, did not violate the state constitution. The Texas Legislature specified in the law instituting the franchise tax that any challenge to it would go directly to the Supreme Court, which was required to rule within 120 days of the case being filed. In its ruling on the case filed in the summer, the Court maintained that the tax applied to the partnership and not the partners, and therefore, did not run afoul of a state constitutional provision prohibiting a personal income tax unless voters give their approval. Future sessions of the Texas Legislature will consider modifications to this tax, which has fallen short of original projections, and is the major source of state revenue that pays for schools, prisons, and other basic functions.
|